Regular price: $20.99
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $20.99
History and politics are always subjective and difficult to approach. So I don't want to go in any specifics. But if you are going to present a historical issue, you should at least try to cover both sides of the story without any obvious bias. Michael Palin keeps decrying the territorial losses of one country but seems completely oblivious to the losses and troubles of the neighbouring country. This kind of attitude keeps showing up in multiple instances. He seems to be keen about some places while completely bored and uninterested by others. Also, he completely skipped Belarus without even explaining why, which again makes the whole thing feel superficial. It's still enjoyable and informative but definitely not as good as it could have been.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
I liked Palin's Brazil very much. It presented a country in very various and lively way, it made me start saving money for my next long vacation to be there - and not visit only Rio and Sao Paolo. So, I bought this one quickly after.
There are few problems with a book. As I lived in "New Europe", I presume is the first one. There is not much new revealed to me, and I don't think only of ex-Yugoslavia, but also of Bolgaria, Romania and Baltic country, which I have not visited yet. Despite being 120+ days around, he did not manage to show countries in interesting ways, as he did for Brazil.
Second problem is repetitiveness, especially from political point of view. Too much time is spent on stories about ex-communist countries, what people think now, how they feel about changes, etc.
And the third one is that some countries receive very little attention. Serbia, for example, is presented only through Belghrade, and even that on very short level.
Not sure I will be continuing with his other travel books.
2 of 3 people found this review helpful