Regular price: $2.99
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $2.99
I liked the author's approach of the subject. Very useful tips at the end of the book.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
What would have made Born to Run Barefoot? better?
The main problem with this book is that he misrepresents McDougall's advice in Born to Run. He Keep saying that McDougall is suggesting that we go out take off our shoes and start running barefoot. That simply is not true. In fact, McDougall was very clear that while he believes that the running method of the Tarahumara Indians is a more natural way to run, and much more likely to be injury free, to switch over to this style of running without a very deliberate, careful, and probably time-consuming effort would be foolish.
What could Chas Gillespie have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?
Gillespie did not present a good case against barefoot running. His science was almost nonexistent (except for anecdotal cases) and in those cases the problem was not the style of running but it was how the athletes who decided to adopt the style moved in to it too quickly. I felt the book was disconnected in that for a while it was about Born to Run, then it switched over to the sociology of running (to find fault again with McDougall's over romanticizing of the Tarahumara culture) and then spent a little bit of time explaining Gillespie's proposed methods of injury free running. Which, by the way, I would bet McDougall would agree with almost 100% since they were basically just everyday common sense ideas.
You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?
The writing style is good it - keeps your interest. The narration is excellent. Too bad the content could not keep up.
Any additional comments?
If you are considering reading this book here's my advice, if you've not yet read Born to Run, read it and skip this book. If you've already read Born to Run, read it again and skip this book - you will get nothing new.
3 of 4 people found this review helpful