Regular price: $24.95
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $24.95
As a professional (lawyer), this is a rather depressing book. It certainly suggests that the best days of true professionals are in the rearview mirror and that the future will be dominated by software, paraprofessionals, "McLawyers" and "McDoctors." I'm afraid there probably is a lot of truth in it. Despite an ever-increasing number of laws and regulations, the legal business has never recovered from the Great Recession. Work is down, except possibly at the mega-firms, and most firms are working hard just to tread water. Some of this is due to legal innovations, such as mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution, some is due to client attitudes (since they made due without legal review in the Great Recession, they seem more willing to take their chances with legal risks), and a great deal is due to technology (computerized document review, etc.). I see these trends continuing, and am somewhat glad I am nearer the end of my career than the beginning.
Although the authors put forward a compelling--albeit somewhat obvious--case about technology, their work itself is far from compelling. For one thing, lumping "professions" together is not completely logical. There is is a huge difference between teachers, clergy, accountants, lawyers and doctors. Some might question calling some of these vocations professions. It would have been far more compelling, for example, to address each profession or vocation individually. Although law and accounting have some similarities, the others do not. For example, medicine is definitely a profession, but it is (a) something everyone needs somewhat regularly (in contrast, many never need a lawyer or an accountant) and (b) hugely affected by government or private insurance (depending on the country). The latter is true of no other profession.
Another weakness of the book is that is has no answers for those practicing, or wanting to practice, law, accounting or medicine. Probably the message is "find something else to do," but that is not particularly helpful and is certainly not satisfying.
The over the top British narration was also a little off-putting, at least to me.
If I had to do it over again, I would pass on this one.
17 of 17 people found this review helpful
Best suited for academic audience. Not so great for general populatiion who is curious about the future of the professions.
4 of 4 people found this review helpful
went over the same point maybe twenty times. Sounded like Stephen Toast but not funny. interesting topic. just about worth it.
Good points and a compelling premise but a shocking amount of repetition. The book could be reduced to a third its current length and have more impact by doing so.
1 of 2 people found this review helpful
The basic premise of this book is that expertise (such as that offered by the authors) should be made freely available in what they term a "technology-based internet society". The logical extension of this is that the expertise they offer to sell you through the purchase of this book should be readily available online, and it is. Just search on technological unemployment and you will find it.
2 of 4 people found this review helpful