Regular price: $19.95

Membership details Membership details
  • A 30-day trial plus your first audiobook, free.
  • 1 credit/month after trial – good for any book, any price.
  • Easy exchanges – swap any book you don’t love.
  • Keep your audiobooks, even if you cancel.
  • After your trial, Audible is just $14.95/month.
Select or Add a new payment method

Buy Now with 1 Credit

By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.

Buy Now for $19.95

Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.

Add to Library for $0.00

By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.

Publisher's Summary

What if....
The last man in the world she could be prevailed upon to marry...is her husband?
In Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, Elizabeth Bennet tells the proud Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy that she wouldn't marry him if he were the last man in the world.
But what if she never said the words? What if circumstances conspired to make her accept Darcy the first time he proposes?
In this installment of Abigail Reynolds's acclaimed Pride and Prejudice Variations, Elizabeth agrees to marry Darcy against her better judgment, setting off a chain of events that nearly brings disaster to them both....
©2006, 2010 Abigail Reynolds (P)2013 Abigail Reynolds
Show More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful
1 out of 5 stars
By vanessa on 02-22-14

BAD. SO VERY VERY BAD

What disappointed you about Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy?

I love Darcy and Elizabeth. I think I must have read Pride and Prejudice at least once a year since I was 12. The couple in this story bear no resemblance in any way to the characters I love so much. It reads like bad fanfiction written by someone who saw the movie once.

What could Abigail Reynolds have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?

I will not be bothering with any other offerings from this author.

Would you be willing to try another one of Rachel E. Hurley’s performances?

It's difficult to tell with something so painfully bad as this how much of said badness the narrator may or may not be responsible for. Presumably she made it the whole way through the story at least once, which is a lot more than I could manage.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

All of the above and more, but not in a good way.

Read More Hide me

1 of 2 people found this review helpful

5 out of 5 stars
By Julia on 04-02-13

frustratingly 'proper' but romantic and tender too

If you could sum up Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy in three words, what would they be?

loving
ignorant
romantic

Who was your favorite character and why?

It has to be Darcy because I'm totally besotted with him. He's strong, thoughtful, loving and caring. He's far too 'proper and aloof' at first but then learns he is not the centre of the universe , just slightly off centre, and becomes lovable and appealing.

What about Rachel E. Hurley’s performance did you like?

she has an easy voice to listen to. it's at just the right pitch and her tone and pronounciation is just right.

Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?

When Elizabeth contemplated suicide i was moved but I also wanted to shake her. That was too selfish for Elizabeth even though she tried to argue she was being selfless.
Devoting her time to Darcy in his illness was also moving as was his amnesia to her attention throughout his illness. Sometimes the good old stiff upper lip is far too frustrating.

Any additional comments?

Easy to read, very enjoyable for all P&P fans who like to read variations in the 'lives' of these wonderful characters.

Read More Hide me

2 of 4 people found this review helpful

See all Reviews

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful
1 out of 5 stars
By Ann Watson on 12-05-13

No, no no!!

What would have made Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy better?

Keeping him true to the character Jane Austen created instead of this unrecognisable, insipid creature.

What will your next listen be?

Certainly not a Prise and Prejudice variation.

How did the narrator detract from the book?

Too rushed. Mispronounced Eliz-i-beth instead of Eliz-A-beth which annoyed me every single time she said it.

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy?

Marketed by Mills and Boone, and with the names changed it would have been tolerable as a romantic frippery but as a variation to Pride and Prejudice I would cut it all and take it off the shelves.

Any additional comments?

This is pure Mills and Boone and nothing whatsoever to do with Jane Austen. The characters were unrecognisable and absolutely untrue to those of Pride and Prejudice apart from (almost) bearing the same names. I have hesitated for a long time to read any of these variations and shall not be reading any more. It is nothing short of a total travesty to be marketed as anything to do with one of the greatest novels ever published. Hated it. I would have given it no stars in any category if I could have.

Read More Hide me

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

3 out of 5 stars
By Catherine on 02-04-14

The Last man in the world overly contrived

Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

Though the story got off to an intriguing start, the second part of the story was excessively contrived. The solutions underlying the comings and goings of the main characters' thoughts and feelings were not credible.

What could Abigail Reynolds have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?

She might have compressed the story or found different details to justifiy its length.

What do you think the narrator could have done better?

She might have pronounced some words more correctly.

Did Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy inspire you to do anything?

To rewite the second part.

Read More Hide me
See all Reviews