I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist

  • by Norman Geisler
  • Narrated by Kate Reading
  • 14 hrs and 47 mins
  • Unabridged Audiobook

Publisher's Summary

I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist argues that Christianity requires the least faith of all worldviews because it is the most reasonable. The authors lay out the evidence for truth, God, and the Bible in logical order and in a readable, non-technical, engaging style. A valuable aid to those interested in examining the reasonableness of the Christian faith, Geisler and Turek provide a firm challenge to the prior beliefs of doubters and skeptics.

More

See More Like This

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful

Funny and compelling, I really enjoyed it.

This is one of the most entertaining apologetics books I have ever read. It was not only compelling but it kept my interest.
Read full review

- greenluck1

Facts on Faith

Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

Yes the book provides a plethora of supporting information on each contention or observation. Most people don't need all that data, but it is wonderful to have it all handy in one book when you do.


What other book might you compare I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist to and why?

The book, "How A Rocket Scientist Can Believe In God" actually covers all the same information in 10% of the space. It provides the logical arguments primarily, without as much of the other supporting evidence


What does Kate Reading bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

Her narration was excellent and easy to listen too. She provided the proper accent and emphasis to get the message across.


Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

I just enjoyed all the detail the authors provided to support their claims


Any additional comments?

Two areas were deficient but they were not part of the primary thesis:
The comment that the Apostles changed the 7th day Sabbath to Sunday, was without any proof. However, clearly there is no proof of this, so the comment should have been left out. Also the discussion of the "Trinity" was no better than most other explanations in that it was clearly not at all convincing. Instead, I was impressed by the simple and in fact, bulletproof explanation of the Trinity elaborated on in the other book I mentioned above, "How A Rocket Scientist Can Believe In God". That is the only place I've seen a worthy explanation in print.

Read full review

- nasamike

Book Details

  • Release Date: 01-07-2010
  • Publisher: christianaudio.com