Darwinism and the Divine examines the implications of evolutionary thought for natural theology, from the time of publication of Darwin's On the Origin of Species to current debates on creationism and intelligent design.
Questions whether Darwin's theory of natural selection really shook our fundamental beliefs, or whether they served to transform and illuminate our views on the origins and meaning of life.
Identifies the forms of natural theology that emerged in 19th-century England and how they were affected by Darwinism.
The most detailed study yet of the intellectual background to William Paley's famous and influential approach to natural theology, set out in 1802.
Brings together material from a variety of disciplines, including the history of ideas, historical and systematic theology, evolutionary biology, anthropology, sociology, and the cognitive science of religion.
Considers how Christian belief has adapted to Darwinism, and asks whether there is a place for design both in the world of science and the world of theology.
A thought-provoking exploration of 21st-century views on evolutionary thought and natural theology, written by the world-renowned theologian and best-selling author.
We've sent an email with your order details. Order ID #:
To access this title, visit your library in the app or on the desktop website.
He is clear-headed, is non-dogmatic, does not manipulate with rhetoric--just says it like he sees it, and is deeply insightful.
I loved how in one chapter he calmly, methodically tells you both why William Paley's arguments (which one might call Intelligent Design 1.0) were the result of a misunderstanding of natural theology, then in another chapter he politely eviscerates meme theory. He is insightful and fair-minded. Another example (actually, this is the background to his criticism of William Paley) is his discussion of how the approach to natural theology adopted by Protestants in England during the Augustan age originated in the Anglican desire to find a suitable response to the Catholic miracle-centered apologetics: a focus on the lawfulness, orderliness of nature, which might be called "divine contrivance." McGrath points out how wrong-headed this was and contrasts it with Thomas Aquinas's approach. Very insightful
See previous response
My reaction to reading this book was the sort that one has to seeing something very beautiful: gratitude and appreciation
Conciliatory, while expanding the debate
I found this book very wordy, so it was sometimes hard to follow. I'd listen again just to understand the convoluted sentences. But I think it might also be better to read it and mark up a copy for reference.
The author really seems to bend over backwards to accommodate theism/Christianity to evolutionary theory. He doesn't seem to call evolution itself into question much; but I think that's because his purpose was to show how thinkers can reconcile established evolutionary theory with religious views. Still, I feel a little let down that he wasn't more rigorous in challenging the "science" of evolution.
A lot of the arguments also seem to center around how we moderns have changed the rules of proof. That bugs me because I wanted to find some form of certainty, and instead it seems like our current philosophy allows previously deniable facts to become proven if we just change the rules used to establish truth. Examples: Science no longer requires empirical proof, you just have to come up with a story that explains the observations better than other stories. Or logical positivism no longer applies; the rules for evidence are based on inference of design rather than "observed" design. Stuff like that. I need an entire course in philosophy to get at how we have chosen what is science and what is not.
Still worth a listen. But expect it to be a conversation opener rather than a set of answers.
I liked the word "the."
Seriously, Audible needs to change this question for nonfiction books.
Tom Parks is a good reader, but one who needs to look up how to pronounce unfamiliar words. I think maybe he said "allele" wrong, and also had odd pronunciations for a few other words that I thought were quite common.
It made me sleep or lose attention sometimes because the author insists on passive voice and "academic" style. He could have made his points in about 1/3 of the pages he used had he been more concise.