In this book, each of the possible positions concerning the relationship between mind and body is clearly explained and thoroughly critiqued. It is concluded that, although mental events are identical with physical events, mentalistic statements are not equivalent with physicalistic statements. It is also shown that the way in which mentalistic statements are non-equivalent with physicalistic statements is deeper than the way in which biological statements are non-equivalent with microphysical statements. In other words, the sense in which mind and body lie on opposite sides of an "explanatory gap" is much stronger than the sense in which biology and microphysics do so.
We've sent an email with your order details. Order ID #:
To access this title, visit your library in the app or on the desktop website.
clear, thorough, powerful
yes, to anyone who is interested in serious philosophy. but only to very, very smart people
the refutation of Davidson's interpretivism
I have not
the truth about the mental
yes, because the prose is almost poetic at times, which you don't get if you're just reading it. k's prose is hard, which makes you want to skip through it. but when you listen to it, the logic comes out, and the beauty too, and then you want to listen to more and more. which is why i am buying his other stuff, even in areas that i don't usually care about
i like the part about davidson
a kind of feminine professionalism, which balances k's autocratic iconoclasticism
yes, but there is a lot of info
now i believe in the explanatory gap. makes stephen pinker look like a high school teacher.