Regular price: $24.95
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $24.95
What disappointed you about The Daily Show and Philosophy?
Every mention of the daily show is ripped right out of the DVD set for the indecision 2004 election set or the interviews Stewart and Clobert did on Fox that got posted on YouTube. I get the very distinct impression that the author stayed up one night taking notes and then wrote a book about the Socratic method while saying how it is VERY distantly related to the Daily Show. If you have seen the 04 set and the Fox interviews than there is no reason to read this book. most of the book is just saying over and over what the daily show is- meaning that if you have seen a 22 minute episode of the show than more than half of the book is redundant. There are no insights in this book- just a scant history of Socrates and some references to the show that you can find on Netflix. There is really- really no reason to read this.
Has The Daily Show and Philosophy turned you off from other books in this genre?
I have given the X and philosophy series several chances- they never seem to bring up much insights into the philosophy or the subject- Exception-- the Batman and philosophy had some good bits.
What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?
How hard can it be to find a few jokes in the archives and talk about the things that Daily Show/Colbert have accomplished? A child could have done a better job- But even that might have been redundant since watching the Daily Show and seeing how Brilliant its contributors are is so very easy. They just wanted to suck some money out of my hands!
Any additional comments?
Go to the Comedy Central Website and enjoy the show for free- you will understand the show far better than if you read this book
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
It is funny to me that one has to tune into a comedy show to get the straight dope on what's going on in the world. It is sobering to consider that people who tune into a comedy show about the news are actually better informed than some of the people who apparently relied on a poor choice by utilizing the "official" (corporate cheerleading) news outlets. I guess it's like the fool being the only person who could tell the king the truth about what's good and bad in the realm.