Quine on the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction

  • by J.-M. Kuczynski
  • Narrated by A. Zens
  • 0 hrs and 37 mins
  • Unabridged Audiobook

Publisher's Summary

W.V.O. tried to prove that no statement is necessarily true. In this work, Quine's argument is stated, analyzed, and shown to be a broken argument for a false conclusion. It is shown that necessary truths are as important as empirical truths to the empirical sciences, the reason being that, without necessary truths, there is no way to organize or interpret data. It comes to light that, in addition to being false, every form of extreme empiricism (e.g. Dewey's pragmatism, Wittgenstein's verificationism, Comte's positivism) is so incoherent that it cannot be clearly stated without thereby being refuted.

More

See More Like This

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful

genius

What made the experience of listening to Quine on the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction the most enjoyable?

Adam Zens. The man is a legend in his own time.


What was the most compelling aspect of this narrative?

What wasn't compelling about it, is more like it!


What does A. Zens bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

Focus


What’s the most interesting tidbit you’ve picked up from this book?

That K is a great writer.


Any additional comments?

I love this narrator.

Read full review

- J.-M. Kuczynski

Book Details

  • Release Date: 09-21-2016
  • Publisher: PHILOSOPHYPEDIA