Regular price: $48.99
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $48.99
What made the experience of listening to A History of Western Philosophy the most enjoyable?
The reminder of each of the greatest philosophers most influential ideas. While I hold a bachelors degree in the subject, this reminder was an enjoyable return to a time when I had left Plato's cave to see more than just shadows on a wall.
What was the most compelling aspect of this narrative?
The Historical background information, though interesting, tended to be longer than I had anticipated. However, in the grand scheme of the book, it turned out to shed wonderful light on the pillars on which platforms each mentioned philosopher stood. Most compelling, however, was the summation of each philosophers contributions to the whole, while giving just enough detail to whet one's appetite to read more about each.
Have you listened to any of Jonathan Keeble’s other performances before? How does this one compare?
I am not familiar with Keeble, but his accent is pleasing - despite some rather interestingly pronounced words.
Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?
There are several embedded jokes for both newcomers to philosophy and veterans of the subject. The Orphic denial of beans in the diet, for instance, is treated by Russell with as much humor as one would expect for such silly nonsense.
Any additional comments?
During my bachelors degree, philosophy was divided into four sections of historical classes (ancient, medieval, modern, and contemporary), Metaphysics I and II, Ethics, two seminars, and Logic - all of which are tested in the final comprehensive exam. This one book encompasses all four historical, Metaphysics I and II, Ethics, and easily also a minor in history, and misses only symbolic logic. While some may argue that this book is no substitute for a classical college education, I would say that an intent listener, who pauses to reflect between chapters and eagerly reads more on each subject he or she finds of particular interest, would gain just as much true knowledge as I did in four years of University. Especially since they would have listened to these lecture much less hungover than I did.
32 of 32 people found this review helpful
There doesn't seem to be a wasted section in this book because all the pieces seem to tie together from early to modern times. The author will first tell you the relevant history and social conditions at the time and how they went about influencing the philosophy he's going to discuss.
You get a really interesting peak into the mindset of a writer during the end of WW II. The author would often bring in the Germans (Nazis) and Japanese and how what he is telling you is relevant to what was going on in the world at the time he wrote the book. Those parts of the books alone are worth reading the whole book.
There was one part of the book during the discussion of Plato when I got overwhelmed, because he kept going on and on and soon as I was understanding one part he'd go on to another part and I wanted to stop listening. I'm glad I didn't, because what he does next is introduce another philosopher by saying how the philosopher disagreed with Plato for the following reasons and then I would start to understand what Plato really meant. It's like studying math. One doesn't really understand the algebra until one learns the calculus and so on.
The book covers a lot, but I retain major parts of it. For example, I remember that Hegel believed that you couldn't understand the part without understanding the whole universe (uncle doesn't exist without nephew), and Marx's class struggle comes from Hegel's ideas about nations and so on.
The narrator does a superb job.
The book is also interesting for another reason. It might be my last foray into a grand survey of philosophy because it does such a good job. As the book preceded through out time, I realized the role of philosophy was getting smaller and smaller as the role of science (and math) was getting larger and larger. The book goes a long way towards showing me how much more important science has become, and how less important philosophy is.
I usually listen to science books, but this book did fill in some gaps for me and I highly recommend it even for lovers of science books.
53 of 54 people found this review helpful
Would you listen to A History of Western Philosophy again? Why?
This book came from Bertrand Russell's war time lectures in the US for the Barnes Foundation. Because they started out as lectures, it works well as an audio book.
Who was your favorite character and why?
I particularly enjoyed the early chapters on Pythagoras and other pre-Socratic philosophers. Russell's characteristic wit shines through in many places, my favourite quote is his suggestion that Pythagoras was a mixture of Einstein and Mrs Eddy.
What about Jonathan Keeble’s performance did you like?
11 of 11 people found this review helpful
Would you consider the audio edition of A History of Western Philosophy to be better than the print version?
Equal, it is nice to have it read but I also have the book. The audio did help to pronounce some of the odd words. I would suggest reading it and having it read aloud would help with understanding the different philosophies.
What did you like best about this story?
It was a history of Western Philosophy!
8 of 8 people found this review helpful
I have no doubt that this book is highly regarded in some circles, and Bertrand Russell an authority on the matter. But as a layperson trying to expand my horizons, this hasn't quite helped me to access Russell's writings. It's a dense book, and the sort of writing that I'd rather have on a page to ponder and re-read as necessary.
You might have different expectations, and if this is the case, then I can't fault the performance or the recording quality. But be warned - know what you're getting yourself into.
4 of 4 people found this review helpful
Fantastic book, very comprehensive. A long read, but we'll worth it if you are interested in the subject.
2 of 2 people found this review helpful