Regular price: $24.95
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $24.95
This "book" seems to be nothing but a bunch of questions stated as fact and speculated on by this person who thinks they can write. The narrator is just some friend of hers who can read those words. The worst excuse for a book I have ever wasted my time attempting to listen to.
4 of 4 people found this review helpful
What would have made Zip Ties and Lies: The Anderson/DiMaggio Case better?
This is the only time I have ever written a review. I could not listen to this book as it is written by a woman, much in the first person, and yet read by a man. At times the author reflects on her own childhood abuse, yet you are hearing this from someone that sounds like your uncle after a few cigars and perhaps a bit of whiskey. Just bizarre and so distracting I could not get through it.
What was the most compelling aspect of this narrative?
It was much like listening to Mozart played on a chainsaw.
How could the performance have been better?
Get any of the wonderful female readers in the world.
What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?
3 of 3 people found this review helpful
The Hannah Anderson case is intriguing but there was not enough story, so the remainder of the book is just the same information said differently. Some facts were repeated so often, I could actually say them word for word with the narrator. The biggest indicator that really showed time wasting strategies by the author: Half a chapter of the narrator reading out 30 something names from a list.