Regular price: $19.95
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $19.95
What would have made Mudville better?
Consistent volume levels
Would you recommend Mudville to your friends? Why or why not?
Not to listen to, perhaps to read.
Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Randy Anderson?
He was fine for all but two characters
If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from Mudville?
Wouldn't delete scene(s) but would listen to the finished product prior to releasing it. Virtually impossible to listen to with headphones on, because of wide variance of character voice fluctuations.
Any additional comments?
I'm not sure the age group the story was aimed at, but the father was portrayed (and sounded) like an idiot cartoon dad. The absolute worst part was the adopted cousin character. The narrator virtually shouted every thing this kid said. The narrator would talk quietly and smoothly throughout the book, but then would shout any line the cousin said. He sounded like a retarded boy with a hearing problem (ie., talks way louder than everyone else). It was close to impossible to finish listening to the book. When ever I anticipated the boy talking I would have to turn my volume way down. It actually hurt my ears.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
What did you love best about Mudville?
As an adult listening to a middle grade book, what I like best about Mudville are its variety of themes, the complexity of its main characters, and the messages it offers young readers. The plot is built upon a baseball showdown between Moundville (Mudville) and a rival neighboring town, but woven into that are themes of friendship, family, loyalty, dedication, selflessness, defining moments, first crushes, and even some issues of race relations.
Baseball always makes for a good metaphor, and Mudville proves to be no exception, to its credit even using the statistical aspect of baseball as a recurring metaphor. Well written, well thought out, and surprisingly complex (but not too complex) for its target audience.
Who was your favorite character and why?
I would not believe anyone who read this book and chose any character other than Sturgis as a favorite. Sure, the narrator, whose father takes Sturgis in as a foster son, is as likeable as he is omnipresent. But Sturgis is the focal point for the complexities of character and plot that make Mudville work. He may be annoying, his story arc may take a strange turn toward the end, but he is without doubt the most interesting character.
What didn’t you like about Randy Anderson’s performance?
I'm going to blame the director rather than the performer for the problems with the way this book is read. Randy Anderson is good for the majority of the time, when he is the voice of Roy, whether it's his voice as narrator or in dialogue. Most of the other voices, however, are so awful that the book was almost unlistenable until I started to get used to them, or to at least expect them when I saw them coming.
Roy's father and mother and the girl he's crushing on are all given unfortunate voices, as are many other characters. But Sturgis, especially because he is so central to the story, is way too far over the top. Roy's voice is almost sotto voce, Sturgis is practically shouting at every turn (speaking in caps lock, as he does when he writes on the internet). It's jarring -- in a car, it is impossible to listen to, having to choose between not hearing Roy or having Sturgis make you jump out of your seat every time he talks.
Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?
Wanted to, but was unable to. I started listening to it in the car on a long trip with my daughter, who is sports nut and only a year or so past Mudville's target age. It was the right length to start and finish on that ride. We turned it off after half an hour because of the difficulty of hearing Roy and the annoyance of Sturgis and the other voices. I finished listening to it on my own on my cell phone, the sound easier to control through earbuds. Still, it was impossible to listen to except in small doses because of the way it was read.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful