Regular price: $31.50
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $31.50
Any additional comments?
There is much to like in this audiobook, which essentially plays out like an extended TED talk, provided you agree with Kissinger’s realpolitic take on nation states balance of power. As might be expected, he lays out his analysis/arguments in a thoughtful, logical progression and the sum amounts to a region by region history lesson on how nation states, motivated by self-interest, strive to achieve a balance of power with their neighbours/rivals so that no nation becomes too strong or too weak. Failure to achieve this balance creates a dangerous, destabilizing effect. In a sense, peace is maintained under this type of framework and World Order takes the reader through a history lesson on how this has evolved in various geopolitical regions over the last 500 years. The roots of HK’s worldview clearly haven’t evolved much over the past 50 years and at 91, it would probably be a bit folly to expect HK to change now. And hence, this underscores a fundamental weakness in World Order. As alternate theories aren’t offered, one doesn’t come away with the sense that this is true historical analysis, nor poli sci primer. As it focuses largely on the nation state, which arguably has less importance in the 21st century than it did in the previous, it hardly qualifies as a prescription either, though HK does touch on some of the challenges ahead (ie. Nuclear proliferation, non state groups, interconnected global communication). Still, I wouldn’t call World Order outdated, nor should it be tossed aside lightly; rather, listening to it is akin to spending the day with an elder sage, who still offers much wisdom and experience to impart but whose worldview is still firmly rooted in the past. It is worth the read as long as the reader always bears in mind that this is The World According to HK.
12 of 12 people found this review helpful
Across centuries of history, war, strategy, leaders, diplomacy, the reach is deep and wide. The ambition is fulfilled, throughout. The author's steady, sober, disciplined voice marches across this amazing canvas with stately, unrelenting clarity. I have never seen all this content in one place, or all these dots so lucidly connected. There is always something to refresh on, ponder, or feast on. For example, there is a fascinating passage comparing Nixon's approach to geo-strategy, and Nixon's strengths, limitations and achievements, in his phase of history, to those of Reagan. There is just enough of the character of these men insightfully invoked to make the comparison deeply revealing. And there is a compactness, discipline and unwavering tone and closeness-yet-distance in relation to the topics and flow of events. The one time I stopped short and felt quite estranged from the analysis was in the kindly words for George W. Bush's Iraq invasion decision and its backdrop of grand national hubris (my word), a decision I considered from the start to be one of the worst strategic calls in American history, and in the ensuing disorder, at this point (2016) feel even more firmly so, yet, the author circled back around and in incomparable velvet-gloved diplomatic language offered the needed critique and pointers to positive lessons (without ever being bombastic toward Bush). (I admit, history has a funny way of defying such neat models, over extended time.) This sort of author composure invites the reader to join in a very intelligent, calm, clear and deliberate sequence of thoughts about the subject matter, whatever the reader's own opinions and conclusions may be on a given point. There are major fruits to be had on many levels here. Admittedly, there is a whole different narrative others might offer about Kissinger and his times, but that's another book, and this one is exemplary, useful, and in my experience, unmatched. I recommend it without hesitation.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful