Regular price: $24.95
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $24.95
Would you listen to The Structure of World History again? Why?
I had read the print version previous to listening. I'll refer back to the print version for key points.
What other book might you compare The Structure of World History to and why?
There are a number of "longue duree" (Braudel) examinations of broad historical sweeps out over recent decades, with titles of long centuries (the Long Twentieth Century), 5000 Years of Debt, multivolume sets from studies of the rise of capitalism as world system [Wallerstein] or evolving structures of power [Mann}, global South perspectives on the ubiquitous nature of imperialism of the modern period (Amin). Structure of World History takes a long, broad, multidisciplinary look at human processes of social exchange.
Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Bob Dunsworth?
It must be someone that has a much better grasp of western intellectual history and associated individuals from that history than the reader of this work. The mispronunciation of names (Kant pronounced Can't), technical philosophical terms (he murdered the term utilitarianism), blending of section headings with narrative text portions; these miscues, though forgivable nevertheless became grating and took away from a certain intellectual authority that is expressed by the author in the text. That is, the lack of precision on the part of the narrator impedes the credibility of the work being read.
What’s the most interesting tidbit you’ve picked up from this book?
Karatani's emphasis on modes of exchange for purposes of human connection and the approaches to power and domination, humans over other humans, or human domination over the nonhuman world is not only cogent in looking at history; but, the future projection of that history as call to abandon the modes of exchanges based on plunder, exploitation and capital accumulation to something of our earlier human beginnings.
That is, he sees our need to recapture a life of exchange of pure gift-giving, or exchanges of reciprocity and mutuality, even if this is just an ideal to stretch towards. These alternative modes of exchange from our ancient past are still with us, never having totally left. They must be done because our alternative future based on the modes of exchange based on conquest and capitalism is a potential state of Hobbesian nature of all out war of all against all, the Schopenhauerian end we are already getting our bellies full of in our current life together on our finite planet.
Any additional comments?
This was an appropriate book of intellectual history for narration because of the clear writing style and the author's systematic return to his themes in circular and repetitions fashion. Please keep offering recordings of newer more academic works-regardless of the previous review that lacked exposure to understand the work. Some of us like to listen to works that we've read, or will read, to help give a different way approach and interpret the text.