Best-selling author Adrian Goldsworthy turns his attention to the Pax Romana, the famous peace and prosperity brought by the Roman Empire at its height in the first and second centuries AD. Yet the Romans were conquerors, imperialists who took by force a vast empire stretching from the Euphrates to the Atlantic coast. Ruthless, Romans won peace not through coexistence but through dominance; millions died and were enslaved during the creation of their empire.
Pax Romana examines how the Romans came to control so much of the world and asks whether traditionally favorable images of the Roman peace are true. Goldsworthy vividly recounts the rebellions of the conquered and examines why they broke out, why most failed, and how they became exceedingly rare. He reveals that hostility was just one reaction to the arrival of Rome and that from the outset, conquered peoples collaborated, formed alliances, and joined invaders, causing resistance movements to fade away.
We've sent an email with your order details. Order ID #:
To access this title, visit your library in the app or on the desktop website.
Not Goldworthy's Best
I wouldn't recommend it to a friend unless they specifically wanted to review it within a larger body of study. I have read several of Goldworthy's other books and this is at the bottom of that list in terms of quality and academic integrity. In many respects it is a well researched and academically solid text, in others I have some concerns which I will address below.
I have not listened to Derek Perkins before, but I thought he did a very good job in his narration. His speech was clear and the tonal quality of his voice was easy to listen to, even for extended periods of time.
No, nothing other than to keep reading and researching the vast and often complicated history of the Roman Empire.
I would have liked to give this book a higher rating, but could not bring myself to do so. For one, at times the dialog seemed to lag and in my opinion could have been presented in a more direct manner. In regards to academic integrity, it is apparent in several places (chapters 11-12) that Goldworthy is either pandering to popular Christian traditions or attempting to validate the historically questionable nature of the Pauline Epistles and Book of Acts. The use of such documents as historical sources, while questionable, isn't without some possible relevance in the construction of an argument or narrative. To give fair and impartial analysis of this period of history, contrasted against the contents of these sources, it is necessary for a serious historian to discuss (in more than just an aside) the numerous issues concerning the authenticity, authorship, biases, known forgeries and date of the original writings- as well as known internal inconsistencies before offering them in the same context as known (and historically credible) historical documents available through Roman and non-Roman sources. This is my chief complaint about the book. Otherwise I would have given it an overall rating of 4 stars.
Best of his books.
- Nashville Cat