Confederate Outlaw: Champ Ferguson and the Civil War in Appalachia
- Conflicting Worlds: New Dimensions of the American Civil War
- Narrated by: Alex L. Vincent
- Length: 8 hrs and 31 mins
- Unabridged Audiobook
- Release date: 11-08-13
- Language: English
- Publisher: University Press Audiobooks
- Whispersync for Voice-ready
Regular price: $19.95
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $19.95
In his analysis, McKnight maintains that Ferguson fought the war on personal terms and with an Old Testament mentality regarding the righteousness of his cause. He believed that friends were friends and enemies were enemies - no middle ground existed. As a result, he killed prewar comrades as well as longtime adversaries without regret, all the while knowing that he might one day face his own brother, who served as a Union scout.
Ferguson’s continued popularity demonstrates that his bloody legend did not die on the gallows. Widespread rumors endured of his last-minute escape from justice, and over time, the borderland terrorist emerged as a folk hero for many southerners. Numerous authors resurrected and romanticized his story for popular audiences, but McKnight’s study deftly separates the myths from reality and weaves a thoughtful, captivating, and accurate portrait of the Confederacy’s most celebrated guerrilla.
An impeccably researched biography, Confederate Outlaw offers an abundance of insight into Ferguson’s wartime motivations, actions, and tactics, and also describes borderland loyalties, guerrilla operations, and military retribution. McKnight concludes that Ferguson, and other irregular warriors operating during the Civil War, saw the conflict as far more of a personal battle than a political one.
Customer ReviewsMost Helpful
By Paul C on 06-11-16
The story of C.F., even with a strong Nationalist/anti-South bias, is fascinating and engaging, albeit (at times) annoying.
The reader's voice & diction is good, but he trips over his words at times and seems to be reading this material cold.
I cannot recommend it, although I cannot say that I am sorry that I took the time to listen to it.
A wonderful example of "Glorious Union" apologetics in its closing chapters.
By AlexIndia on 02-25-14
The southern answer to the tyrannical yankees
If you could sum up Confederate Outlaw: Champ Ferguson and the Civil War in Appalachia in three words, what would they be?
I would say that the three best words to describe this story line would be vindication, riotousness and tenacity.
What did you like best about this story?
It did follow as much of Champs life as possible, considering the lack of the ability to interview eyewitnesses since all are dead from that time. Also the lack of personal papers from Champ makes it difficult to get inside his head.
How could the performance have been better?
I am sure the reader was trying to do the best he could, but it sounded like the fellow had been asked to read the book cold, without any run-through. He consistently stumbled over words and really missed the colloquialism of the area. My family was from that area and I have cousins who speak with the accents of Tennessee and Kentucky, so I know how things should be said. The reading of the book makes it very very hard to get through it. Like stumbling through the dark in an unfamiliar room. Very awkward.
Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?
Yes... had the reader been better. I kept wanting to read the book for him, it was very painful to get through... I mean the reader was pretty bad!
Any additional comments?
I am a southerner, my family had a plantation in what is now Picket County Tennessee and we had a run in with Champ Ferguson during the War. We supported the south 100% but protected an inlay who was deathly ill from small pox. Champ came to kill this fellow and my Great Great Grandfather (Willis Huddleston Parris) talked Champ out of it because Champ knew how strongly we supported the cause for the south and my Great Great Grandfather was a County Judge as well. I wrote the author with the details of this story after I read his book but he did not seem to be very interested. I still hold the opinions of my forefathers and apparently the author does not, thus even though the book was well written and held my attention (minus the horrible reading) I felt the author was just slightly biased. But I could be wrong. I just felt the very slightest bias. Over all I think this is a great book for Civl War buffs in that it sheds light on aspects of the War which breaks the traditional battle lines and generals in command.