Prime logo Prime members: New to Audible?
Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
Premium Plus auto-renews for $14.95/mo after 30 days. Cancel anytime.
Barren SEAD: USAF Defense Suppression Doctrine, 1953-1972  By  cover art

Barren SEAD: USAF Defense Suppression Doctrine, 1953-1972

By: James L. Young Jr.
Narrated by: CAPT Kevin F. Spalding USNR-Ret
Try for $0.00

$14.95/month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $14.95

Buy for $14.95

Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.

Publisher's summary

Since 1972, the United States Air Force has argued that its operations against North Vietnam were unsuccessful primarily through a combination of civilian interference and poor strategic choices. Often citing the "success" of Operation Linebacker II as an example of what might have been had its leaders been given free rein, for almost 40 years, the Air Force has maintained that its proper employment is the key to winning America's wars.

In Barren SEAD, award-winning historian James L. Young, Jr., propagates a different theory: Instead of being a sign of what the Air Force was capable of, Linebacker II was a bitter failure that starkly outlined the USAF's limitations. Furthermore, instead of the meddling of the Johnson and Nixon administrations, this defeat was brought about by Air Force leaders' refusal to develop a Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) doctrine from 1953-1972. Relying primarily on Air Force archival documents, memoirs, and contemporary doctrinal publications, Young illustrates just how dangerous the Air Force's failure to nurture its SEAD capability was during this period of the Cold War.

©2015 James Young (P)2015 James Young
  • Unabridged Audiobook
  • Categories: History

What listeners say about Barren SEAD: USAF Defense Suppression Doctrine, 1953-1972

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    4
  • 4 Stars
    3
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Performance
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    4
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Story
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    3
  • 4 Stars
    3
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Listener received this title free

The nuts and bolts of SEAD and why the Air Force struggled to conquer the skies in Vietnam.

SEAD is a very important component of modern air warfare, this book along with a couple others have taught me a lot about SAM/AAA dangers during Vietnam. It also illustrates that the Air Forces love affair with the Strategic Bomber and Nuclear weapons plagued the Air Force’s command long after the days of “MiG Alley” when it was recognized how far the USAAF had fallen post WW2. I find it appalling that red-tape and ego driven rivalries lead to so many pilots being shot down. I am also very grateful that while it might have been a long time coming, at least we now have a fully fleshed out SEAD doctrine and a very capable suite of on board jamming systems to allow our Weasels to properly protect our attack aircraft.

Captain Spaulding whom I am familiar with because of his work on the Veteran Stories series has a voice and delivery that is perfectly suits for the material. He knows those acronyms too, which is always pleasing. Nevertheless if you have listened to Hunter Killers, Lords of the Sky, flight of the Intruder and enjoyed them you will like this book because it tells how they struggled to over come the SAM/AAA challenge and will make you realize that it was just as much a far removed command hampering things as well as a camouflaged determined stubborn enemy.

I received this book for free in exchange for an honest review and absolutely recommend it for aviation students as well as Vietnam students also.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

Very captivating book

In this excellent book award winning historian James L Young JR gives his theory of what the The Unitet States Air Force has argued since 1972.

The book is really captivating, I just couldn't stop listening to this book

Even people who haven't got much insight into US Air Force nor history can have advantages of this book as it's told in a manner that is understandable for everyone

I really enjoyed the book

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

A Technical Report

While I enjoyed this book, I'm not sure that I am the right audience for it. To me it seems that it is less a 'book' and more of a report or analysis and is more geared towards an academic audience rather than the casual reader. Reasonably technical in nature, and assuming of some basic military understanding (it doesn't stop to break down all the three letter acronyms it uses) and US military history the book/report analyses the USAF strategic and from the end of the Korean War through most of the Vietnam War.

This is not a entry level history book, as it assumes knowledge of the military actions of the period. It's not entry level for USAF, as it assumes knowledge of some military technology etc. But I don't feel these are high hurdles, and it is certainly not a extremely high level analysis. Assuming you have some understanding and knowledge on these two items, and have an interest in the subject, then this book has a great deal going for it and some great information

In short, it goes through the variety of strategies (or lack thereof) that USAF tried, as well as the details of the fighters used by both USAF and their opponents. The basic premise boils down to the USAF's belief that bombers would be the main air assault weapons, as they were in World War 2, rather than dog fights between fighters. This resulted in fighters being made to certain requirements (like having a few missiles and bombs but no inbuilt machine gun) that didn't actually match what was happening in the combat zones.


----

Narrator Kevin Spalding does a good job. With his military background he easily able to discuss the technical aspects and he comes across knowing what he is talking about. He is easy to listen to and understand. Clear and concise.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!