Regular price: $27.99
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $27.99
This illuminating study traces the transformation of the right to arms from its inception in English and colonial American law to today's impassioned gun-control debate. As historian and legal scholar Patrick J. Charles shows, what the right to arms means to Americans, as well as what it legally protects, has changed drastically since its first appearance in the 1689 Declaration of Rights.
Armed in America explores how and why the right to arms transformed at different points in history. The right was initially meant to serve as a parliamentary right of resistance, yet by the ratification of the Second Amendment in 1791 the right had become indispensably intertwined with civic republicanism. As the United States progressed into the 19th century the right continued to change - this time away from civic republicanism and towards the individual-right understanding that is known today, albeit with the important caveat that the right could be severely restricted by the government's police power.
Throughout the 20th century this understanding of the right remained the predominant view. But working behind the scenes was the beginnings of the gun-rights movement - a movement that was started in the early 20th century through the collective efforts of sporting magazine editors and was eventually commandeered by the National Rifle Association to become the gun-rights movement known today.
Listeners looking to sort through the shrill rhetoric surrounding the current gun debate and arrive at an informed understanding of the legal and historical development of the right to arms will find this book to be an invaluable resource.
Customer ReviewsMost Helpful
By Kindle Customer on 05-14-18
A fair attempt to honest History of Gun Rights.
I strongly disagree with the Author of the book on Gun Rights and Gun Control Laws, but he does makes the attempt to be fair about the Gun Rights Movement and how they perceive the issues.
I would recommend the book for others to begin a conversation but not to end it.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
By William R. Toddmancillas on 04-06-18
Malinterpretation of the 2nd amendment
Narration: baritone voice is pleasant, speech rate is just right, clearly enunciated and properly pronounced. Excellent narration.
Content: credible, thoroughly research based indictment of tortured understanding of second amendment, which has resulted in intolerably lax gun uncontrol laws.
Methodology: beautifully illustrates legal scholars approach to understanding f this vexing problem.
0 of 1 people found this review helpful