Regular price: $26.92
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $26.92
I’ve tried for years to read this novel but was never able to get through it. There are several dozen characters - more even than usual for Dostoevsky (I think) - and the Russian names, always a daunting task to keep straight, are overwhelming. The novel takes a very long time introducing the characters and setting up the main action. to get started.
Constantine Gregory’s reading (of Constance Garnett’s translation) somehow made most of those problems go away. I had the benefit of my list of names from previous attempts, and maybe that helped. The main story still takes awhile to get moving, but Gregory infuses both narration and dialogue with a liveliness and humor that had escaped me earlier. Some of the scenes that confused me earlier now seem hilariously over the top - in a good way.
Many of the characters suffer from a claustrophobic self-consciousness - practically a trademark of Dostoevsky’s. The narrator is a little odd, partly in and partly out of the action: a member of the community, a friend of Stepan Verkovensky, but sometimes omniscient, and possibly unreliable. Three men in particular dominate the action: Stepan Verkovensky, an aging writer, philosopher, and poseur; his son Pyotr; and Pyotr’s cohort and erstwhile friend Nikolai Stavrogin, an aristocrat whose actions always tend toward the unexpected.
Pyotr Verkovensky is a particularly complex and nasty character. He babbles on endlessly, in the most obnoxious way; yet in his babbling he manages to brutally insult his father, threaten Nikolai Stavrogin, and humiliate the local governor, who claims an awareness of his subversive activities. While he turns out NOT to be the main character, Pyotr is in fact the man who sets most of the action in motion. That action expands to include several murders, arson, a woman beaten to death by a mob, a duel, and several suicides. It’s all in the service of misguided youthful nihilism.
There is an appendix, which is difficult to listen to but should not be skipped. It’s a chapter that Dostoevsky was forced by his publisher to omit because it describes a descent into horror, on the part of Stavrogin, that is no less horrible for its omission of any explicit detail. Dostoevsky was right that it’s essential to an understanding of Stavrogin’s character - thief, poisoner, and child rapist that he is. Omitting it would be like omitting the Grand Inquisitor chapter from the Brothers Karamazov.
Constantine Gregory is a wonderful narrator, always finding what seems to me exactly the right tone to strike in a given scene, and keeping all the characters straight with clear distinctions in pitch and accent. I look forward to hearing his other Naxos readings of Dostoevsky.
10 of 11 people found this review helpful
What made the experience of listening to The Possessed the most enjoyable?
Constantine Gregory makes what would otherwise be an extremely difficult to follow narrative almost enjoyable. His nuances of accents and almost comical over-emphasis of some of the characters is at first a bit unusual, but becomes indispensable. Dostoyevsky's books, to me, is ALL about the dialogues. The Possessed may feel like it takes a very long time to get off the mark, and even when it does, I was constantly expecting more activity from the story - only to settle into a very deep, immersive drama that is acted out in the dialogues. And how about that final chapter on Stavrogin's Confession. OMG! I did not see that coming and it almost overshadowed the entire book in itself. This is a book that will stay with you for the rest of your life.
What other book might you compare The Possessed to and why?
I listened to Of Crime and Punishment some time ago - also written by Dostoyevsky and narrated by Constance Gregory. If you liked Of Crime and Punishment you may find The Possessed to stand back slightly - but not much.
Which character – as performed by Constantine Gregory – was your favorite?
Oh there's no doubt about this one - Stepan Trofimovich Verkhovensky. Although I had no trouble imagining the ever so well animated Varvara Petrovna Stavrogina.
Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?
The character Stepan Trofimovich provides moments of comical diversion but this is not a book of laughter. The fate of Shatov and Kirillov as well as the Stavrogin's Confession was very emotional.
Any additional comments?
The story is long and feels like it is filled with (literally) hours of unnecessary detail - but it becomes essential to the point where I am sometimes disappointed that the author did not go into even MORE detail. Considering the very different time and setting to what most users would be familiar with - it is necessary for detail as it fills out much could otherwise only be achieved in a movie (where a picture could tell a thousand words). I think Dostoyevsky didn't have a movie to tell his story with, so he used the thousand words. This was a story told to the level of detail where one can close your eyes and be transported to the provincial Russia in the 1860's.