Charlotte Gordon's new work is a fresh look at the lives of Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley, who together comprise one of the most illustrious and inspiring mother-daughter pairs in history. Wollstonecraft published the first full articulation of women's rights in 1792, risking her reputation and sometimes her life in pursuit of her radical goals, while her daughter Mary Shelley wrote the masterpiece Frankenstein in 1819, and famously professed her love to the poet Percy Shelley on her mother's grave.
Although these two women never really knew each other, their lives were so closely intertwined and eerily similar that it seems impossible to consider one without the other: Both became writers; both fell in love with brilliant but impossible men, and were single mothers who had children out of wedlock; both struggled to negotiate their need for love and companionship with their need for independence. The narrative takes listeners from Revolutionary France to the Scottish Highlands, from Victorian England to the canals of Venice, flowing like an engrossing historical novel.
We've sent an email with your order details. Order ID #:
To access this title, visit your library in the app or on the desktop website.
Fascinating dual biography and viewpoint on feminism...
- Austen Blincow
Tons of info, poor format choice.
I knew little about Mary Shelley other than that she wrote Frankenstein and was married to the poet, Shelley. I knew nothing about her mother. I am happy to now be able to say the opposite. I learned a great deal about both from this book, and find them to have been remarkable and admirable women in most respects. See my next answer, which covers the aspect of this book that I liked the least.
For some (dumb) reason, the biographies of this mother and daughter are arranged in alternating chapters in this book. The odd numbered chapters cover the life story of one, and the even numbered chapters cover the life of the other. Consequently, the reader is jerked back or forward through time at the start of every chapter. Yes, each chapter began with the woman's name and the years covered. But that attempt at clarification did not fend off all confusion, since both mother and daughter are inconveniently named Mary! Many times as I listened, I wondered how the Mary of the current chapter had suddenly become much older or younger than she had been a few moments earlier, or how the current Mary had suddenly wound up in a country that she had not intended to visit at that point in her life. Of course I figured out my mistakes immediately. But I got tired of having to make the effort. If I could reconstruct this book, I'd tell Mary Wollstonecraft's tale first, then begin that of her daughter, Mary Shelley.
I don't recall listening to Susan Lyon before, but I certainly enjoyed her performance in this case--very well done.
Yes, considering the information imparted, which I much appreciate. However, if I could go back in time, I'd skip every other chapter to first focus on Mary Wollstonecraft. Then I'd return to the beginning of Mary Shelley's story and listen to her life. I much prefer continuity to jarring mental hopscotch.
Aside from the unnatural "every other chapter being about one of two different women" technique, I was also sometimes annoyed by the excess of detail and redundancies. The author left nothing out of these two biographies. Every fact that could be gleaned from research seemed to have been included. Sometimes I felt like I was sharing every single moment of these women's lives. That level of TMI can be exhausting for a reader. At other times, my annoyance stemmed from the author's vigorous yet unfortunately repetitive defenses of these women's attitudes and life choices. I often thought, "I'm with you, I get it, they were wonderful. Let's move on." As with so many things in life, less can be more--in this case, more interesting, more attention-sustaining and more memorable, in a good way.
- Gotta Tellya "KEC"