Regular price: $38.49
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $38.49
If you are like me the first item with an audio title is the narration. It is very well presented. Despite a few pronunciation glitches, for example Pierre, the production is enjoyable to listen to.
Fraser’s presentation is not for the faint of heart Little House fairy tale reader so be ready for a bumpy ride if you are.
This is a dual bio of Wilder and Lane set against a heavy dose of historical backdrop. And almost immediately this is where Fraser goes off the rails. She will recover at times and I stuck with her because the topic is so interesting to me.
Fraser is no historian and it shows. She makes many mistakes that sometimes appear to be just sloppy work. While others are clearly set piece to support a bias. For which she has many.
I gather from a quick look at her other work she has done some environmental writing. And she brings this to Little House as subtle as a Hurricane
The Homestead Act, homesteading and westward expansion are fundamental to the story. A clear understanding is obviously the foundation to the entire work. Fraser brings her environmental focus like a crusade into the story. The Ingalls and Wilders were simply duped into a “scam,” destined to fail because the Homestead Act was a failure and then were complicit in fraud and get this - climate change. Yes Almanzo with his two row sulky plow caused global climate change induced drought.
With that the reader may ask if Fraser has a grasp on 19th century agricultural practices, as this would form another foundation to the story? Well no, she doesn’t. For example, she will indict Almanzo as committing fraud in his HA claim because he left. She ignores the fact that a homesteader had six months to occupy said claim & this was because they would have had no crop or supplies to support the stock.
Almanzo, according to Fraser, committed fraud by lying about his age on the HA application. This being another example of how terrible the process was. Here we have a clear case of ‘fraud’ on her part. It would be difficult to see it otherwise. The records are clear and can be easily checked with NARA docs.
Almanzo’s age issue was Wilder and Lane playing with facts decades later. This is well known and Fraser knows that Lane in particular is fast and loose with facts. But we have to get the fraud angle worked in somehow.
Little picture things are sprinkled throughout. For example, a “Missouri posse” fought a “proxy war” in “squatter Kansas.” Boy that’s a lot to unpack. A posse is a legal group raised by a sheriff. She does like a posse and will use the word incorrectly multiple times. The Missourian’s were most often called Bushwackers. The era known as Bleeding Kansas was not a “proxy war.” I am not sure what her “squatter” context even is. But there is no historical one for it. I imagine it is another bias against the entire settlement process.
Keystone South Dakota is not at 9,100 ft elevation. Google can be a friend to an author’s fact checker. Although I doubt one was used, a history undergrad intern would have caught most of this.
When covering the move from Wisconsin to Mo/Ks she will use 1850’s overland travel as an example. The Wilders were not going 3,000 miles across unsettled land on a trail of tears covered in burials. It was 1869 in settled Iowa and Missouri.
It is unfortunate we have another title in the Little House pantheon that comes at it from a literary point. Fraser would have done well to stick hard and fast to her area of expertise. I found these sections interesting, but always there is the “can I trust this on a subject I am less knowledgable in?”
Even more unfortunate is the Little House fan who wants to more and uses Fraser exclusively will take this as history. It most certainly is not and note Amazon did not classify it in that category.
If one wants to learn Wilder and her times, Pioneer Girl would be a much better source. Then one could read other secondary sources on areas of interest. For example, Edwards, Homesteading the Plains will show you that it was neither a “failure” or a “fraud.”
22 of 23 people found this review helpful
This text can be broken into two parts. The 1st part talks about Laura's youth and where the series took some liberties. The 2nd part talks about her adult life going into her daughter rose's life discussing how the books came into being and what has happened since the family all passed away legally In terms of the rights to the books. It is an excellent listen and I was captivated with all of the behind the scenes information. it made me hope that someone would attempt a new little house series that is accurate to Laura's writings. a must-listen for all Wilder fans.
12 of 13 people found this review helpful