Regular price: $12.57
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for $12.57
Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?
I'm glad I listened to this. The time went by quickly.
What did you like best about this story?
I liked the straightforwardness of De Quincey's description of his addiction.
What do you think the narrator could have done better?
I suppose the relative monotone of the narrator fit the straightforwardness of the message. I did sometimes wish the narrator had varied his delivery more, however.
Was Confessions of an English Opium Eater worth the listening time?
Yes. It was for me, because I had always wanted to 'read.' It's a short piece, so it goes quickly.
Any additional comments?
The sound quality was not of the best. Maybe it's not so much the narrator as the editor, but there were some skips.
The piece was probably shocking when it was first written. And what's interesting now is how De Quincey attempts to frame his addiction as a medical condition, which may have been a different approach back then. He humanizes his addiction, which may be a new thing for some readers.
De Quincey's prose style can be interesting. This was a new type of essay, apparently, and De Quincey was a forerunner of a certain type of 'personal essay.' I read the thing as much for that as anything and found it pretty much what I expected, over all. I enjoyed it and would probably enjoy it more a second time through.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful
This is an interesting story. I'm not sure I'll get through it. The story is interesting and so is the narration but I don't know that I'm all that interested in the ins and outs of opium eating. I selected it because its a very famous story and many people put it on their lists of must reads. So its selection is part of my desire to catch up on "famous" reads to see why the books are so famous. So far, the "famous" books I've attempted have not been able to hold my attention. I have the same problem with the "classics" so it's probably just me and not the book itself.
2 of 7 people found this review helpful