Sedgwick has written a parallel biography of two prominent figures from the Federalist era whose lives came together on the dueling ground. I have always been interested in Alexander Hamilton and have read most of the biographies about him. Hamilton was the chief aide to George Washington during the American Revolution and author of most of the Federalist Papers. He was the first secretary of the Treasury. Aaron Burr was a prominent attorney and was Vice President under Thomas Jefferson. I found it most interesting to be able to compare the two men’s lives side by side; I feel as if I have a better understanding of the two men.
Sedgwick goes into the emotional and psychological makeup of the pair. The author presents evenhanded and insightful profiles of the two men. He states that Hamilton was hyperactive and produced volumes of work and had an intense devotion to the Federalist cause. Burr was a brooding and libidinous and tended to communicate in code. Sedgwick states he was inspired by Gore Vidal’s novel “Burr” (1973). The book is well written and meticulously researched. Sedgwick is a great storyteller therefore the book reads almost like a novel.
Sedgwick wrote about his own famous family in his book “In My Blood” (2007) from the revolutionary era of Theodore Sedgwick to modern day actress Kyra Sedgwick. P. J. Ochlan did a good job narrating the book. The book is fairly long at about 18 hours.
17 of 19 people found this review helpful
Call Bo I knew a lot about the duel didn't know a lot about the events that ran up to it nor did I know what happened to Burr after the death of Hamilton so I really appreciated this in depth well researched history. I hated the narrators voice he sounded like a voiceover commercial.
2 of 3 people found this review helpful
Would you try another book from John Sedgwick and/or P. J. Ochlan?
I would not read another book by Sedgwick. There is clear bias against Hamilton. I cannot handle 'history' with a view that is clearly one-sided. It felt like Hamilton had done something personally to the author. Since conjecture is the main them, I imagine Hamilton stating to the Sedgwick of his time (Theodore), "Curses to any of your decedents who takes up a pen to write about me." The author, upon hearing this took up his pen against Hamilton which could only mean Burr had to be the victim of a jealous immigrant who became his stalker who had to be taken out.
Would you be willing to try another one of P. J. Ochlan’s performances?
I would not listen to the reader because listening to this book was made worse by the computer-like delivery.
If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from War of Two?
All personal views of the main characters. They each had many flaws. Shining a light on the flaws of one while downplaying and forgiving the other's was just too much. Conversely, they each had many good points. The same was done. Light was shown on Burr's good parts. Hamilton's goodness were flukes or not good at all. It was too much.
Any additional comments?
I need another non-fiction book. This bordered on fiction.
The number of mistakes which could have been rectify with simple research makes one wonders accuracy.
It's the kind of book when you are done you feel like you know the whole story.
I was enthralled from start to finish. What a great book. I learned a lot from this book.
1 of 3 people found this review helpful